Budget cuts could damage Obama administration’s plans to strengthen State Department, USAID Because of Congress’ proposals to slice spending for the STATE DEPT., the Obama administration is increasingly looking toward new funding mechanisms, known as blended funds, that draw from Defense Section budgets for actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, CQ reports. But that technique could ‘undercut the Obama administration’s efforts to make a more robust STATE DEPT cipro action . And U.S. Company for International Development ‘ and ‘create significant congressional oversight problems,’ the news headlines service adds. ‘The brainchild of Protection and State, the fund was made in an effort to address the urgent have to complete large advancement projects. On a much shorter timeline than State can be used to,’ regarding to CQ. However, one senior congressional staffer stated the fund creates ‘a three-ring circus’ of congressional, State and Defense personnel. ‘Although the blended funds are important tools, they also could, in the end, undermine the agency they were designed to bolster, aides stated,’ CQ reports . House Republicans Introduce Three-Week CR ‘With backing from Senate Democrats, House Republicans on Fri unveiled a three-week continuing quality [CR] that could cut another $6 billion in federal government spending and keep carefully the government running through April 8,’ Roll Call reviews. The bill, that was launched by Appropriations Committee Seat Rep. Hal Rogers , ‘includes $3.5 billion in programmatic cuts and eliminates $2.6 billion in earmarked accounts’ . The House is expected to approve the CR this week, and ‘the Senate likely to follow suit,’ regarding to National Journal. ‘Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Bulk Whip Dick Durbin stated Sunday that they might support Home Republicans’ three-week continuing quality to stave off a government shutdown,’ a second Roll Call article reports . This content was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family members Foundation. Kaiser Health Information, an unbiased news service editorially, is a scheduled program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan healthcare policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
Bullied children may experience long term health problems Bullied children may experience chronic, systemic inflammation that persists into adulthood, while bullies may actually reap health advantages of increasing their public status through bullying, according to researchers at Duke Medicine. The scholarly research, executed in collaboration with the University of Warwick, the University of NEW YORK at Chapel Hill and Emory University, is published on the web in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the week of May 12, 2014. ‘Our findings consider the biological outcomes of bullying, and by studying a marker of swelling, provide a potential mechanism for how this cultural interaction make a difference later wellness functioning,’ stated William E. Copeland, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Duke University College of Medicine and the study's lead author. Earlier research have suggested that victims of childhood bullying suffer interpersonal and emotional outcomes into adulthood, including increases in nervousness and depression. Yet, bullied children survey health problems also, such as pain and illness susceptibility, which may extend beyond emotional outcomes. ‘Among victims of bullying, there seems to be some effect on health status in adulthood,’ Copeland said. ‘In this study, we asked whether childhood bullying will get 'under the skin' to affect physical wellness.’ Copeland and his colleagues used data from the fantastic Smoky Mountains Research, a robust, population-centered study that has gathered info on 1,420 individuals for more than 20 years. Individuals were selected to take part in the prospective research randomly, and therefore weren’t at a higher risk of mental illness or being bullied. Individuals were interviewed throughout childhood, adolescence and youthful adulthood, and among various other topics, were asked about their experiences with bullying. The researchers collected small blood samples to check out biological factors also. Using the blood samples, the experts measured C-reactive proteins , a marker of low-grade swelling and a risk factor for health problems including metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. ‘CRP levels are affected by a number of stressors, including poor diet, lack of sleep and infection, but we've discovered that they are linked to psychosocial factors also,’ Copeland said. ‘By managing for individuals' pre-existing CRP levels, even before involvement in bullying, we get a clearer knowledge of how bullying could transformation the trajectory of CRP levels.’ Related StoriesJumping genes: a marker for early cancer analysis? An interview with Dr KazazianAmputation is not wound healingNew clinical chemistry analyzer released by EKF at Medica 2015Three groups of individuals had been analyzed: victims of bullying, those who were both victims and bullies, and those who had been bullies purely. Although CRP amounts rose for all groups as they entered adulthood, victims of childhood bullying got higher CRP amounts as adults than the other groups. Actually, the CRP amounts increased with the number of times the individuals were bullied. Young adults who had been both bullies and victims as kids had CRP levels comparable to those not really involved in bullying, while bullies had the lowest CRP – less than those uninvolved in bullying even. Thus, being a bully and enhancing one's social position through this interaction might protect against increases in the inflammatory marker. While bullying is more prevalent and regarded as less harmful than childhood abuse or maltreatment, the findings claim that bullying can disrupt degrees of irritation into adulthood, similar from what is noticed in other forms of childhood trauma. ‘Our study discovered that a child's function in bullying may serve as either a risk or a protective factor for low-grade irritation,’ Copeland said. ‘Enhanced interpersonal status seems to have a biological advantage. Nevertheless, there are ways children can experience social success from bullying others aside.’ The researchers figured reducing bullying, in addition to reducing swelling among victims of bullying, could be key targets for promoting physical and emotional health insurance and lessening the chance for diseases associated with inflammation. Furthermore to Copeland, research authors include E. Jane Costello of Duke, Dieter Wolke and Suzet Tanya Lereya of the University of Warwick in britain, Lilly Shanahan of the University of NEW YORK at Chapel Carol and Hill Worthman of Emory University.